Well, with the General Election just over the horizon and
having been asked by a number of Stoke on Trent homeowners and Stoke on Trent
buy to let landlords what the different main parties would do to the local
property market, in this week’s article we focus on Labour’s contentious Right
to Buy proposal for private tenants. Launched in September, the plan was
designed to force landlords to sell their buy to let investments to their tenants
who wished to buy them…. at a substantial discount.
Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell told the FT in September that, under
a new Labour government, tenants would be given the Right to Buy their tenanted
home with a hefty discount - just like the Tory Right to Buy policy for Council
house renters that came into force after the 1979 General Election.
Yet
it was not certain who would have been expected to pay for discounts on buy to
let homes sold to tenants. Four years ago, Jeremy Corbyn advocated using the
£14bn of tax allowances that UK landlords had at the time to pay for these
discounts, allowing tenants to buy their tenanted home at the same discount as
they would a local authority home without leaving the landlord out of pocket.
However,
these tax allowances have been substantially reduced with the changes in the way
mortgage interest relief on landlords’ mortgages is calculated, meaning that
this method of funding would no longer be feasible. In fact, bankrolling a
project at a modest 20% discount for the whole of the UK would cost £177.84bn; a
lot more than the £14billion quoted by Mr Corbyn. So, what would that policy cost Stoke on Trent landlords?
Labours
policy of 20% Right to Buy discount could
cost Stoke on Trent landlords £506,401,810
cost Stoke on Trent landlords £506,401,810
… and if Stoke on Trent
tenants got the maximum discount of 35% that Council tenants have with the
Right to Buy scheme that would cost Stoke on Trent landlords £886,203,170.
However, it appears Mr McDonnell has re-considered the
original suggestion and done a (slight) U-turn, stating it should apply only to
the richest landlords and not those who only own a couple of rental
properties. He was quoted in The Times as saying, “There’s a large
number of individuals or families who have bought another property as an asset
for the future and we wouldn’t want to endanger that”.
Yet, even this somewhat watered-down account still creates
threats to the private rental sector and Stoke on Trent’s overall stock of
private rented homes. John McDonnell seems to have altered his initial thought
to permit all private tenants the right to buy from their landlords to apply
only to those with more than a couple of buy to let properties. The shift
appears to be aimed at pacifying middle England small time landlords who are
probably swing voters with smaller property investments and instead, Labour’s
focus is on the larger scale buy to let investors. Looking at the stats, and
being generous that we are only looking at landlords with 6 or more (not the
couple that Mr McConnell suggested) ……
Of the 16,020 rental properties in Stoke on Trent, 4,373
are owned by Stoke on Trent landlords with 6 or more properties in their
portfolio
To target these larger scale landlords, who would unquestionably
leave the property market in their hordes if their buy to let investments could
be so easily destabilised. There would be mass sell offs before the legislation
became law, thus making the tenants homeless (and who would house them??) ..and
even if that didn’t happen, it would be very damaging and someone (probably
landlords) would have to stump up the £48.54bn national bill (£138,233,150 in Stoke on Trent alone).
If Labour want to fix the property market, it needs
long term certainty and confidence, yet even these revised policies would instantly
challenge this
And don’t think I am just Labour bashing here as the Tory 2014
Help to Buy scheme hasn’t really helped either as their scheme which gave first
time buyers (FTB) a 20% interest free loan, if they put down a 5% deposit, has
been a boon for new home builders.
The Tory’s announced recently another £10bn of taxpayer’s money will be pumped into a scheme which, quite frankly, wasn’t needed to boost an already decent property market. The banks were already giving 95% first time buyer (FTB) mortgages from 2010 and the Help to Buy scheme was only allowed on new homes purchases, meaning it didn’t help the larger second-hand market. That £10bn could have been better spent building Council houses, not helping the large plc builders line their pockets with Government cash.
No comments:
Post a Comment