So, for example, let’s say we have a Stoke
on Trent landlord, a high rate tax payer who has a BTL investment where the
rent is £900 a month and the mortgage is £600 per month. In the tax year just gone (16/17), assuming
no other costs or allowable items …
·
Annual rental
income £10,800.
·
Taxable rental
income would be £3600 after tax relief from mortgage relief
·
Meaning they would
pay £1,440 in income tax on the rental income
And assuming no other changes ... the
landlord would have income tax liability’s (at the time of writing May 2017) in
the tax years of ...
·
(17/18) £1,800
·
(18/19) £2,160
·
(19/20) £2,520
·
(20/21) £2,880
Landlords who are higher rate tax
payers are going to have be a lot smarter with their BTL investments and ensure
they are maximising their rental properties full rental capability. However, there is another option for
landlords.
in the town could set up a Limited
Company and sell their
property personally to that Limited Company
·
Q4 2015 / Q1 2016 –
5,403 Buy to Let Limited Companies Set Up
·
Q2 2016 / Q3 2016 –
3,007 Buy to Let Limited Companies Set Up
·
Q4 2016 / Q1 2017 –
7,149 Buy to Let Limited Companies Set Up
So, by selling their buy to let
investments to their own limited company, owned 100% by them, these landlords could
then offset the costs of running their BTL’s as an 'allowable expense' -
effectively writing off the cost of 100% of their mortgage outgoings, wear and
tear and upkeep, letting agent’s fees etc.
I am undeniably seeing more Stoke on Trent landlords
approach me for my thoughts on setting up a BTL limited company, so should you make the change to a limited
company?
In fact, I
have done some extensive research with companies house in the 15 months (1st
January 2016 to 31st March 2017 and 81 Buy To Let Limited Companies
have been set up in the ST postcode alone).
Well if you are looking to hold your BTL
investments for a long time it could be very favourable to take the short-term
pain of putting your BTL’s in a limited company for a long-term gain. You see, there are huge tax advantages to
swapping property ownership into a limited company but there are some big costs
that go with the privilege.
As the law sees the new Limited
Company as a separate entity to yourself, you are legally selling your BTL
property to your Limited Company, just like you would be selling it on the open
market. Your Limited company would have to pay Stamp Duty on the purchase and
if you (as an individual) made a profit from the original purchase price, there
could be a capital gains tax liability of 18% to 28%. The mortgage might need to be redeemed and
renegotiated (with appropriate exit charges).
On a more
positive note, what I have seen though by incorporating (setting up the Limited
Company) is landlords can roll up all their
little buy to let mortgages into one big loan, often meaning they obtain a lower
interest rate and the ability to advance new purchase capital. Finally, if the tax liability is too high to
swap to a limited company, some savvy buy to let investors are leaving their
existing portfolios in their personal name whilst purchasing any new investment
through a limited company? Just an idea
(not advice!).
No comments:
Post a Comment