If you have been reading my articles on the Stoke-on-Trent property
market recently, you will see that in the three years since the referendum of
the ‘B’ word (that word is banned in our household), we have proved beyond
doubt that it (whose name shall remain nameless) has had no effect on the Stoke-on-Trent
property market (or the UK as a whole).
So one might ask, what does
affect the property market locally? Well many things on the demand side include
wages, job security, interest rates, availability of mortgages, confidence in
the economy, inflation, speculative demand ... the list goes on. Yet as my blog
readers will note, I like to delve deeper into the numbers and I have found an
interesting correlation between unemployment and the number of properties sold
(i.e. transactions).
Why transaction levels and
not house prices? Well just looking at Stoke-on-Trent house prices as a
bellwether has flaws. Many property
market commentators and economists believe transaction numbers (the number of
properties sold) give a more accurate and candid indicator of the health of the
property market than just house values alone. The reason is twofold. First most people when they sell also buy, so if
property values have dropped by 10% or risen by 10% on the one you are selling,
it would have done the same on the one you are buying - meaning to judge the
health of a property market is very one dimensional. Secondly, the act of
moving is very much a human thing. Property habitually conveys a robust emotional connection with
homeowners - a connection that few would attribute to their other investments
like their savings or stock market investments. Moving home could be described
as a human enterprise, moving from one chapter of one’s life to another. When
people move home, it shows they are moving forward in their lives and so this
gives a great indicator of the health of the property market.
Property transactions in
Stoke-on-Trent dropped by 62.83%, whilst unemployment in Stoke-on-Trent rose by
54.37% during the 2007 to 2009 Global Financial Crash
There is clearly a relationship between conditions in the Stoke-on-Trent job market and the number of people who move home ... interesting don’t you think?
Year
|
Unemployment
% Rate in
Stoke-on-Trent
|
Number of Properties Sold in Stoke-on-Trent
|
2004
|
5.3
|
6405
|
2005
|
5.6
|
5324
|
2006
|
5.8
|
6089
|
2007
|
6.6
|
5903
|
2008
|
8.6
|
2949
|
2009
|
10.2
|
2194
|
2010
|
10.3
|
2253
|
2011
|
10.1
|
2220
|
2012
|
8.9
|
2275
|
2013
|
9.2
|
2794
|
2014
|
6.6
|
3525
|
2015
|
6.3
|
3577
|
2016
|
5.6
|
3570
|
2017
|
5.5
|
3965
|
2018
|
5.8
|
3794
|
Now I am not saying
unemployment is the only factor influencing the Stoke-on-Trent property
- but it has to be said there is a link.
As a country
(and indeed here in Stoke-on-Trent) over the last 40 years, we have seen a
shift in the outlook over the purpose of housing and the development of the
religion of following house prices (and I appreciate the irony of me writing
these articles on Stoke-on-Trent - feeding that habit!) Yet, when did owning a
home turn from buying a roof over your head to an out and out investment
vehicle? I do wish people would stop fretting about their intrinsic value being
associated with their Stoke-on-Trent home. Now of course, I am not dismissing the current levels of Stoke-on-Trent house
prices - we just have to take into consideration other metrics alongside them
when judging the health of the property market locally.
One final thought, looking on a broader scale in the UK, those towns and
cities whose property markets bounced back after the Global Financial Crash had
high levels of employment and low unemployment whilst places with high
unemployment and relatively low employment have, on the other hand, typically
underperformed.
So the next time you are considering a house move or buying a buy to let property in Stoke-on-Trent ... don’t make your judgement on house price growth alone.
No comments:
Post a Comment